[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081030185322.GE17822@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:53:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: jens.axboe@...cle.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
asit.k.mallick@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch] generic-ipi: fix the smp_mb() placement
* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> Subject: generic-ipi: fix the smp_mb() placement
>
> smp_mb() is needed (to make the memory operations visible globally)
> before sending the ipi on the sender and the receiver (on Alpha
> atleast) needs smp_read_barrier_depends() in the handler before
> reading the call_single_queue list in a lock-free fashion.
>
> On x86, x2apic mode register accesses for sending IPI's don't have
> serializing semantics. So the need for smp_mb() before sending the
> IPI becomes more critical in x2apic mode.
>
> Remove the unnecessary smp_mb() in csd_flag_wait(), as the presence
> of that smp_mb() doesn't mean anything on the sender, when the ipi
> receiver is not doing any thing special (like memory fence) after
> clearing the CSD_FLAG_WAIT.
nice! Did you see an actual lockup due to this? Seems like a v2.6.28
fix to me in any case.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists