[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225404368.19324.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:06:08 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix smp generic helper voyager breakage
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 22:54 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -167,9 +167,11 @@ config GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
> > config X86_SMP
> > bool
> > depends on SMP && ((X86_32 && !X86_VOYAGER) || X86_64)
> > - select USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> > default y
> >
> > +config USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> > + def_bool y
> > +
>
> uhm, that's a bogus change - USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS must not be set
> on UP. This will break all UP compilations, on all x86 UP boxes:
Heh, that would be one thing I don't build in my test rig.
> kernel/softirq.c: In function '__try_remote_softirq':
> kernel/softirq.c:522: error: implicit declaration of function '__smp_call_function_single'
>
> so i've removed your patch for now.
OK, I'll update it ... I assume it should depend on CONFIG_SMP then?
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists