[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081030222111.GA18600@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:21:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix smp generic helper voyager breakage
* James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 22:54 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > @@ -167,9 +167,11 @@ config GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
> > > config X86_SMP
> > > bool
> > > depends on SMP && ((X86_32 && !X86_VOYAGER) || X86_64)
> > > - select USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> > > default y
> > >
> > > +config USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> > > + def_bool y
> > > +
> >
> > uhm, that's a bogus change - USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS must not be set
> > on UP. This will break all UP compilations, on all x86 UP boxes:
>
> Heh, that would be one thing I don't build in my test rig.
lets put it this way: that change, when put in my test rig, already
broke more x86 boxes than there are working Voyager test-boxes in
existence ;-) [it broke the build on three of them]
> > kernel/softirq.c: In function '__try_remote_softirq':
> > kernel/softirq.c:522: error: implicit declaration of function '__smp_call_function_single'
> >
> > so i've removed your patch for now.
>
> OK, I'll update it ... I assume it should depend on CONFIG_SMP then?
correct.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists