[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081030222308.GM30303@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:23:08 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix compile breakage caused by x86: add
->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
* James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> >From da69eaed98248bf4b29e94d62a4e01a5c3758669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:14:29 -0500
> Subject: [VOYAGER] x86: add voyager pre_time_init_hook
>
> This was introduced by:
>
> Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
> Date: Sat Jul 19 18:02:26 2008 -0700
>
> x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
>
> In theory, voyager could also make use of the x86_quirks hooks but,
> unfortunately, they're not set up correctly for that to happen yet.
okay, so how about setting them up that way instead? That way we win
twice: it becomes a tiny bit easier to add Voyager support to the
generic platform code, and we also fix the build breakage.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists