[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225475246.3264.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:47:26 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix compile breakage caused by x86: add
->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 23:23 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> > >From da69eaed98248bf4b29e94d62a4e01a5c3758669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:14:29 -0500
> > Subject: [VOYAGER] x86: add voyager pre_time_init_hook
> >
> > This was introduced by:
> >
> > Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
> > Date: Sat Jul 19 18:02:26 2008 -0700
> >
> > x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
> >
> > In theory, voyager could also make use of the x86_quirks hooks but,
> > unfortunately, they're not set up correctly for that to happen yet.
>
> okay, so how about setting them up that way instead? That way we win
> twice: it becomes a tiny bit easier to add Voyager support to the
> generic platform code, and we also fix the build breakage.
Sure, it should be possible ... but reworking the current quirk
infrastructure would definitely be an enhancement, whereas this is a
compile fix for 2.6.28-rc
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists