[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081031064455.29eb2285@tleilax.poochiereds.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:44:55 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2008-10-30-02-23 uploaded (cifs)
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:39:50 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> Steve French wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:24:25 -0700 akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> >>
> >>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2008-10-30-02-23 has been uploaded to
> >>>
> >>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> >>>
> >>> It contains the following patches against 2.6.28-rc2:
> >> fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'cifs_mount':
> >> fs/cifs/connect.c:2180: error: request for member 'sin_addr' in something not a structure or union
> >>
> >> rand-config attached.
> >
> > These line numbers don't match anywhere close to what I expect to find
> > in -mm based on the contents of fs/cifs in cifs-2.6.git tree. My
> > guess is that has a cifs patch from Jeff Layton, not in cifs-2.6.git
> > which may have other dependencies, and in any case IIRC has since been
> > removed from -mm but if not that patch may be the problem.
> >
> > The closest line I have is:
> >
> > sprintf(pSesInfo->serverName, "%u.%u.%u.%u",
> > NIPQUAD(sin_server.sin_addr.s_addr));
> >
> > and since sin_server is defined as
> > struct sockaddr_in sin_server;
> > that should be fine.
>
> I can't tell you whether this is in cifs.git, but the erring lines are:
>
> tcon =
> find_unc(sin_server.sin_addr.s_addr, volume_info.UNC,
> volume_info.username);
>
> where sin_server.sin_addr should be sin_server->sin_addr.
>
> HTH.
This looks like a goof on my part. I have a later patch in this series
that eliminates that call. In an earlier patch series, these patches
were in reverse order and I neglected to fix this when I reordered the
series.
I think Andrew ended up dropping this patch from -mm for the time
being. It's going to need modification anyway due to other changes, so
it's probably best that it find its way to mainline via his tree.
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists