[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081101193258.GB28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:32:58 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] el3_common_init() should be __devinit, not __init
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:27:57PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 07:16:14PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:12:50PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 06:20:19PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > > > -static int __init el3_common_init(struct net_device *dev)
> > > > +static int __devinit el3_common_init(struct net_device *dev)
> > >
> > > Al, here is much better patch:
> >
> > [essentially kill devinit/cpuinit]
> >
> > What the hell makes it better?
>
> Wasting efforts for too little gain?
>
> More or less every distro enables HOTPLUG and HOTPLUG_CPU.
More or less every distro shits udev and hald; it's not a reason to make
the corrsponding stuff in the kernel mandatory. The same applies here...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists