linux-kernel - Re: upstream regression (IO-APIC?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081102123559.3fc6c33d@infradead.org>
Date:	Sun, 2 Nov 2008 12:35:59 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alok N Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: upstream regression (IO-APIC?)

On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 21:24:24 +0100
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:

> The quick fix would be to replace 1000 / HZ by the magic number "4"
> but the major question is whether can we reliably depend on the
> tsc_khz for lpj?
 
I said I didn't like it before, and I still don't....


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/