lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:55:43 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <>
Cc:	Alan Jenkins <>,
	linux-kernel <>,
	linux acpi <>
Subject: Re: eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4

On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:51:45PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

> Not if you can enter or exit HARD_BLOCK, you're not.  If you cannot it is
> fine.  But if you can, you really need to rfkill_force_state() on resume,

The state can always be overridden by software, so I think we're fine 

> And the rfkill core seems to be buggy when you call force_state() on resume,
> which you guys didn't hit because you're not doing it yet.  See my other
> email...

Just to make sure: in the case where we *don't* support hard blocking, 
there's no need to do anything special in the driver on resume and 
rfkill should (but currently doesn't) do the right thing itself?

Matthew Garrett |
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists