[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491094B2.4090107@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:30:10 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ide: rework handling of serialized ports
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ide: rework handling of serialized ports
> * hpt366: set IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE in hwif->host_flags if needed
> in init_hwif_hpt366(). Remove HPT_SERIALIZE_IO while at it.
> * Set IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE in hwif->host_flags if needed in
> ide_init_port().
> * Convert init_irq() to use IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE together with
> hwif->host to find out ports which need to be serialized.
> * Remove no longer needed save_match() and ide_hwif_t.serialized.
> This patch should fix the incorrect grouping of port(s) from
> host(s) that need serialization with port(s) that happen to use
> the same IRQ(s) but are from the host(s) that don't need it.
> Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
> static int __devinit init_dma_hpt366(ide_hwif_t *hwif,
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
[...]
> + if (hwif->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE) {
> + if (hwif->host == h->host)
> + match = h;
Can be collapsed into a single *if*, and braces not needed either way.
> @@ -1436,10 +1398,8 @@ static void ide_init_port(ide_hwif_t *hw
> }
>
> if ((d->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE) ||
> - ((d->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE_DMA) && hwif->dma_base)) {
> - if (hwif->mate)
> - hwif->mate->serialized = hwif->serialized = 1;
> - }
> + ((d->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE_DMA) && hwif->dma_base))
> + hwif->host_flags |= IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE;
I don't see what use is forcing this flag at all here -- it doesn't seem
to be checked only in init_irq() now, so this *if* could just be moved there...
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists