[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491095C4.3000503@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:34:44 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ide: rework handling of serialized ports
Hello, I wrote:
>> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
> [...]
>> @@ -1436,10 +1398,8 @@ static void ide_init_port(ide_hwif_t *hw
>> }
>>
>> if ((d->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE) ||
>> - ((d->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE_DMA) && hwif->dma_base)) {
>> - if (hwif->mate)
>> - hwif->mate->serialized = hwif->serialized = 1;
>> - }
>> + ((d->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE_DMA) && hwif->dma_base))
>> + hwif->host_flags |= IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE;
> I don't see what use is forcing this flag at all here -- it doesn't
> seem to be checked only in init_irq() now, so this *if* could just be
> moved there...
Oops, rephrasing hurts sometimes: I meant "it seems", of course. :-)
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists