[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081106202736.GC6688@halcrowt61p.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:27:36 -0600
From: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@...il.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tchicks@...ibm.com>,
David Kleikamp <shaggy@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] eCryptfs: Filename Encryption
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 04:57:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2008-11-04 15:37:54, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> > This patchset implements filename encryption via a
> > passphrase-derived mount-wide Filename Encryption Key (FNEK)
> > specified as a mount parameter. Each encrypted filename has a
> > fixed prefix indicating that eCryptfs should try to decrypt the
> > filename. When eCryptfs encounters
>
> That is 'interesting'. What happens if normal filename has that
> prefix?
If the lower filename has the prefix but does not have a valid tag 70
packet following the prefix, then eCryptfs will complain in the syslog
and then pass through the lower filename as-is.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists