[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1226004746.8898.6.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:52:26 -0600
From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: mhalcrow@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@...il.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Tyler C Hicks <tchicks@...ibm.com>,
David Kleikamp <shaggy@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] eCryptfs: Filename Encryption
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:27 -0600, mhalcrow@...ux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 04:57:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Tue 2008-11-04 15:37:54, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> > > This patchset implements filename encryption via a
> > > passphrase-derived mount-wide Filename Encryption Key (FNEK)
> > > specified as a mount parameter. Each encrypted filename has a
> > > fixed prefix indicating that eCryptfs should try to decrypt the
> > > filename. When eCryptfs encounters
> >
> > That is 'interesting'. What happens if normal filename has that
> > prefix?
>
> If the lower filename has the prefix but does not have a valid tag 70
> packet following the prefix, then eCryptfs will complain in the syslog
> and then pass through the lower filename as-is.
I'd recommend hiding this kind of syslog verbosity behind a debug config
option. I think it would be very easy to create a DOS attack against
ecryptfs by putting all sorts of clever things in the lower file system.
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists