[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081106212256.GC24579@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:22:56 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"Christopher S. Aker" <caker@...shore.net>,
xen devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> a "cleanup" impact line is only added if the change is not intended to
>> have any side-effects whatsoever.
>>
>> We can drop it but it would be really nice to figure out what's going
>> on. In a very quick late-night look i cannot see anything particularly
>> weird about it, but based on the type of changes it does there are
>> three leading candidates: lost high 32 bits, zero extend problem, or
>> incorrect types.
>
> Yeah, I couldn't see anything either. It's a reasonable cleanup (I
> never did understand that struct page * cast), but its always nicer
> when cleanups don't break working code ;).
Would be nice to have a look at the vmlinux delta with the patch
reverted, on the .config that breaks. By all means the object code
should be the same.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists