[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200811062223.09400.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:23:09 +0100
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc: "John Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier@...too.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ssb: Fix DMA-API compilation for non-PCI systems
On Thursday 06 November 2008 22:16:00 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 15:49, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > --- wireless-testing.orig/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h 2008-08-01 17:26:05.000000000 +0200
> > +++ wireless-testing/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h 2008-11-06 21:45:37.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -427,12 +427,16 @@ static inline int ssb_dma_mapping_error(
> > {
> > switch (dev->bus->bustype) {
> > case SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SSB_PCIHOST
> > return pci_dma_mapping_error(dev->bus->host_pci, addr);
> > +#endif
> > + break;
> > case SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB:
> > return dma_mapping_error(dev->dev, addr);
> > default:
> > - __ssb_dma_not_implemented(dev);
> > + break;
> > }
>
> all these functions now read:
> default: break;
> seems kind of pointless ... why not just drop that case completely
Because the compiler complains "not handled all cases...".
And yes, we do want to trigger __ssb_dma_not_implemented() for
these cases.
--
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists