[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081107061952.GF3860@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:19:52 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
"Fischer, Anna" <anna.fischer@...com>, H L <swdevyid@...oo.com>,
"randy.dunlap@...cle.com" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"grundler@...isc-linux.org" <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
"Chiang, Alexander" <achiang@...com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"rdreier@...co.com" <rdreier@...co.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org" <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/16 v6] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 03:58:54PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > What we would rather do in KVM, is have the VFs appear in the host as
> > standard network devices. We would then like to back our existing PV
> > driver to this VF directly bypassing the host networking stack. A key
> > feature here is being able to fill the VF's receive queue with guest
> > memory instead of host kernel memory so that you can get zero-copy
> > receive traffic. This will perform just as well as doing passthrough
> > (at least) and avoid all that ugliness of dealing with SR-IOV in the guest.
>
> This argues for ignoring the SR-IOV mess completely. Just have the
> host driver expose multiple 'ethN' devices.
That would work, but do we want to do that for every different type of
driver?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists