[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081107004824.GA28780@x200.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:48:24 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] add /proc/pid/stack to dump task's stack trace
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:30:23PM -0800, Ken Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >> +static int proc_pid_stack(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer)
> >> +{
> >> + for (i = 0; i < trace.nr_entries; i++) {
> >> + len += sprintf(buffer + len, "[<%p>] %pS\n",
> >> + (void *)entries[i], (void
> >> *)entries[i]);
> >
> > hm, this looks like a potential buffer overflow - isnt 'buffer' here
> > only valid up to the next PAGE_SIZE boundary?
So, make trace depth low enough, or even better use seqfiles, if you're
scared by buffer overflows.
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -130,6 +131,12 @@ struct pid_entry {
> { .proc_show = &proc_##OTYPE } )
>
> /*
> + * buffer size used for proc read. See proc_info_read().
> + * 4K page size but our output routines use some slack for overruns
> + */
> +#define PROC_BLOCK_SIZE (3*1024)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists