[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081107153814.GD9709@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:38:14 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v3] blktrace: conversion to tracepoints
Em Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:32:16PM +0100, Jens Axboe escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 07 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'll apply this for 2.6.29. I'm assuming you have tested this as well?
> > >
> >
> > FYI: I tested this on a 16-way AMD x86_64 box (128GB RAM, a couple of
> > Smart Array (CCISS) P800's). Running Jens' for-2.6.29 git tree versus a
> > recent Linus 2.6.28-rc3 tree. I was doing kernel makes (10 passes for
> > both kernels), and found that things worked just fine. All values below
> > are in seconds:
> >
> > 2.6.28-rc3:
> >
> > Part Min Avg Max Dev
> > -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
> > untar 17.996 22.565 23.522 1.690
> > mk-cfg 3.279 3.454 3.529 0.070
> > mk-kern 140.837 141.557 142.549 0.626
> > mk-clean 10.460 11.604 12.710 0.758
> > -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
> > Combd 172.941 179.180 181.600 2.470
> > ======== ======= ======= ======= =======
> > %sys 7.67% 7.78% 8.03% 0.114
> >
> >
> > Jens' origin/for-2.6.29:
> >
> > Part Min Avg Max Dev
> > -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
> > untar 18.138 22.576 24.279 1.693
> > mk-cfg 3.270 3.483 3.751 0.118
> > mk-kern 141.290 142.115 142.666 0.439
> > mk-clean 8.263 9.609 10.211 0.624
> > -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
> > Combd 173.736 177.783 179.654 1.786
> > ======== ======= ======= ======= =======
> > %sys 7.77% 7.85% 8.01% 0.074
> >
> >
> > Not sure why the 'make clean' portion of the runs went noticeably better
> > with the newer code, but in any event, I don't see much difference
> > elsewhere, and for sure the blktrace portion of things worked correctly.
> > [blktrace + blkparse + blkrawverify + btt all worked just fine out of
> > the box.]
>
> Thanks a lot for running that test Alan, I think it looks fine!
Indeed, thanks a lot!
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists