[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081112130714.GA24472@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:07:14 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] unlikely profiler and tracer
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Ingo,
> > >
> > > The following patches are in:
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> > >
> > > branch: tip/devel
> > >
> > > Steven Rostedt (2):
> > > trace: profile likely and unlikely annotations
> > > ftrace: unlikely annotation tracer
> >
> > i've created a new topic branch for this tracer:
> > tip/tracing/branch-tracer, and applied your patches to that branch.
>
> Good idea,
>
> This profiler is very useful, but also very intrusive. I would like
> it to get a broader audience for testing.
two more small details i noticed:
- does it do proper self-test? It doesnt seem so at first sight.
- i'd suggest a rename patch that does UNLIKELY_PROFILE => BRANCH_PROFILING.
[ 'to profile' is the verb we use generally (it's a noun too but
we tend to use 'profiling' for that in other places of the
kernel) - so we already have CONFIG_PROFILING, etc. ]
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists