[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081113114908.42a6a8a7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:49:08 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp,
menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] memcg: free all at rmdir
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:07:58 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> If we do this then we can make the above "keep" behaviour non-optional,
> and the operator gets to choose whether or not to drop the caches
> before doing the rmdir.
>
> Plus, we get a new per-memcg drop_caches capability. And it's a nicer
> interface, and it doesn't have the obvious races which on_rmdir has,
> etc.
>
> hm?
>
Balbir, how would you want to do ?
I planned to post shrink_uage patch later (it's easy to be implemented) regardless
of acceptance of this patch.
So, I think we should add shrink_usage now and drop this is a way to go.
I think I can prepare patch soon. But I'd like to push handle-swap-cache patch
before introducing shrink_usage.
Then, posting following 2 patch for this week is my current intention.
[1/2] handle swap cache
[2/2] shrink_usage patch (instead of this patch)
Objection ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists