linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <491CAD20.9020202@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:41:36 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, travis@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq v13

Andrew Morton wrote:

>> ...
>>
>>>> +static unsigned int kstat_irqs_legacy[NR_IRQS_LEGACY][NR_CPUS];
>>> Do these need to be 32-bit?  Maybe they'll fit in 16-bit, dunno.
>>>
>> struct irq_desc {
>>         unsigned int            irq;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
>>         struct list_head        list;
>>         struct list_head        hash_entry;
>>         struct timer_rand_state *timer_rand_state;
>>         unsigned int            *kstat_irqs;
> 
> That doesn't address my question.
> 
> The above array can be very large.  Can we halve its size by using
> 16-bit quantities?  Will this code ever encounter IRQ numbers larger
> than 65536?
> 

NR_CPUS=4096, NR_IRQS_LEGACY=16, and that array will be 256k bytes

later could change that alloc_bootmem, so NR_CPUS will be replaced to nr_cpu_ids

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/