[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081113145846.bef2bb90.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:58:46 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, travis@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq v13
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:41:36 -0800
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>>> +static unsigned int kstat_irqs_legacy[NR_IRQS_LEGACY][NR_CPUS];
> >>> Do these need to be 32-bit? Maybe they'll fit in 16-bit, dunno.
> >>>
> >> struct irq_desc {
> >> unsigned int irq;
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> >> struct list_head list;
> >> struct list_head hash_entry;
> >> struct timer_rand_state *timer_rand_state;
> >> unsigned int *kstat_irqs;
> >
> > That doesn't address my question.
> >
> > The above array can be very large. Can we halve its size by using
> > 16-bit quantities? Will this code ever encounter IRQ numbers larger
> > than 65536?
> >
>
> NR_CPUS=4096, NR_IRQS_LEGACY=16, and that array will be 256k bytes
>
> later could change that alloc_bootmem, so NR_CPUS will be replaced to nr_cpu_ids
Do the entries in that array need to be 32-bit?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists