[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811141515470.26818@anakin>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:16:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can you add the staging tree to -next?
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:42:48 +0100 (CET) Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > Apart from the patches you receive against -next, is there any other
> > advantage, giving staging is disabled?
>
> Others compile linux-next with all sorts of configs, so we hopefully will
> see any build failures. In fact, Greg might even built it with staging
> enabled :-)
>
> We will also see any merge conflicts (though there probably won't be
> many).
>
> I may also see if I can arrange for a build in each architecture with
> staging enabled in my infrastructure here, but it may take a little while.
I build them for m68k anyway, but due to timezone differences, you usually find
(and sometimes even fix ;-) the problems long before I notice them.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists