linux-kernel - Re: Can you add the staging tree to -next?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081114185016.0097d4eb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:50:16 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can you add the staging tree to -next?

Hi Geert,

On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:42:48 +0100 (CET) Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Apart from the patches you receive against -next, is there any other
> advantage, giving staging is disabled?

Others compile linux-next with all sorts of configs, so we hopefully will
see any build failures.  In fact, Greg might even built it with staging
enabled :-)

We will also see any merge conflicts (though there probably won't be
many).

I may also see if I can arrange for a build in each architecture with
staging enabled in my infrastructure here, but it may take a little while.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped