[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491FA920.1030805@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:01:20 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] memcontrol: use simple_malloc()/simple_free()
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:33:46PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> use simple_malloc()/simple_free() instead of current codes.
>
> struct mem_cgroup can't reach the size when kmalloc starts failing.
Good catch! Thanx!
compiler will optimize it and select the correct way.
using "simple_malloc()/simple_free()" here is no sense.
>
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -1062,11 +1062,7 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(void)
>> {
>> struct mem_cgroup *mem;
>>
>> - if (sizeof(*mem) < PAGE_SIZE)
>> - mem = kmalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL);
>> - else
>> - mem = vmalloc(sizeof(*mem));
>> -
>> + mem = simple_malloc(sizeof(*mem));
>> if (mem)
>> memset(mem, 0, sizeof(*mem));
>> return mem;
>> @@ -1074,10 +1070,7 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(void)
>>
>> static void mem_cgroup_free(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
>> {
>> - if (sizeof(*mem) < PAGE_SIZE)
>> - kfree(mem);
>> - else
>> - vfree(mem);
>> + simple_free(mem);
>> }
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists