[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081117195316.GA8235@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:53:16 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dada1@...mosbay.com,
rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
efault@....de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from
2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > The scheduler has accounted for at least %10 of the tbench
> > regressions at this point, what are you talking about?
>
> I'm wondering if you're not looking at totally different issues.
>
> For example, if I recall correctly, David had a big hit on the
> hrtimers. And I wonder if perhaps Ingo's numbers are without
> hrtimers or something?
hrtimers should not be an issue anymore since this commit:
| commit 0c4b83da58ec2e96ce9c44c211d6eac5f9dae478
| Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
| Date: Mon Oct 20 14:27:43 2008 +0200
|
| sched: disable the hrtick for now
|
| David Miller reported that hrtick update overhead has tripled the
| wakeup overhead on Sparc64.
|
| That is too much - disable the HRTICK feature for now by default,
| until a faster implementation is found.
|
| Reported-by: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
| Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
| Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Which was included in v2.6.28-rc1 already.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists