[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0811171149100.18283@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:55:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: mingo@...e.hu, dada1@...mosbay.com, rjw@...k.pl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, efault@....de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22
-> 2.6.28
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, David Miller wrote:
>
> Again, do a non-NMI profile and the top (at least for me)
> looks like this:
Can _you_ please do a NMI profile and see what your real problem is?
I can't imagine that Niagara (or whatever) is so weak that it can't do
NMI's.
The fact is, David, that Ingo just posted a profile that was _better_ than
anything you have ever posted, and it doesn't show what you complain
about. So he's not seeing it. Asking him to do a _stupid_ profile is just
that: stupid.
So try to figure out why his (better) profile doesn't match your
(inferior) one, instead of asking him to do stupid things. It's some
difference in architectures, likely: maybe the sparc timekeeping is crap,
maybe it's a cache issue and sparc caches are crap, maybe it's something
where Niagara (is it niagara) has some oddness that shows up because it
has that odd four-threads+four-cores or whatever.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists