[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811190942490.27671@anakin>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:44:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
cc: Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-m68k.git
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:49:01 +0100 (CET) Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > (Finally) I created an experimental git tree for Linux/m68k:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git
> >
> > It contains more or less all patches I had in my quilt series at
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/geert/linux-m68k-patches-2.6/
> > A notable exception is m68k-PRIVATE-m68k-changes.diff, which hardcoded ARCH to
> > m68k.
> >
> > I also created for-next and for-linus branches. Do they look OK?
>
> They look good. I have added the for-linus branch as my m68k-current
What's the purpose of your m68k-current tree? There should not be anything
in m68k#for-linus that's not in m68k#for-next.
> tree and changed my m68k tree over to the for-next branch.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists