linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel-mci: move atmel-mci.h file to include/linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:36:31 +0100
From:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel@...32linux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel-mci: move atmel-mci.h file to include/linux

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:43:34 +0100
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:

> Ben Dooks :
> > 
> > Would people object to putting this in include/linux/mmc/atmel.h
> > to avoid making include/linux abound with device/subsystem/machine
> > specific header files?
> 
> I tend to agree *but* it seems that header files in include/linux/mmc
> are mostly sd/mmc subsystem core files (I mean, not driver ones).
> Although, a bunch of atmel-a_driver.h files are already in include/linux...
> 
> Pierre, a comment ?
> 

I'd prefer if include/linux/mmc could stay clean and just have core
stuff since the header files are basically the reference documentation
for the subsystem. But if you can't find any other way...

-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)