| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <386072610811182339n54f67624o1595144b4b86d4b8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:39:20 +0800
From: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney@...nel.org>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Graf Yang" <graf.yang@...log.com>,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Blackfin arch: SMP supporting patchset: BF561 related code
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:05:04 +0800 Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Graf Yang <graf.yang@...log.com>
>>
>> Blackfin dual core BF561 processor can support SMP like features.
>> https://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=linux-kernel:smp-like
>>
>> In this patch, we provide SMP extend to BF561 kernel code
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/include/mach/mem_map.h
>> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/include/mach/mem_map.h
>> @@ -85,4 +85,124 @@
>> #define L1_SCRATCH_START COREA_L1_SCRATCH_START
>> #define L1_SCRATCH_LENGTH 0x1000
>>
>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> +
>> +#define get_l1_scratch_start_cpu(cpu) \
>> + ({ unsigned long __addr; \
>> + __addr = (cpu) ? COREB_L1_SCRATCH_START : COREA_L1_SCRATCH_START;\
>> + __addr; })
>> +
>> +#define get_l1_code_start_cpu(cpu) \
>> + ({ unsigned long __addr; \
>> + __addr = (cpu) ? COREB_L1_CODE_START : COREA_L1_CODE_START; \
>> + __addr; })
>> +
>> +#define get_l1_data_a_start_cpu(cpu) \
>> + ({ unsigned long __addr; \
>> + __addr = (cpu) ? COREB_L1_DATA_A_START : COREA_L1_DATA_A_START;\
>> + __addr; })
>> +
>> +#define get_l1_data_b_start_cpu(cpu) \
>> + ({ unsigned long __addr; \
>> + __addr = (cpu) ? COREB_L1_DATA_B_START : COREA_L1_DATA_B_START;\
>> + __addr; })
>> +
>> +#define get_l1_scratch_start() get_l1_scratch_start_cpu(blackfin_core_id())
>> +#define get_l1_code_start() get_l1_code_start_cpu(blackfin_core_id())
>> +#define get_l1_data_a_start() get_l1_data_a_start_cpu(blackfin_core_id())
>> +#define get_l1_data_b_start() get_l1_data_b_start_cpu(blackfin_core_id())
>> +
>> +#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
>> +#define get_l1_scratch_start_cpu(cpu) L1_SCRATCH_START
>> +#define get_l1_code_start_cpu(cpu) L1_CODE_START
>> +#define get_l1_data_a_start_cpu(cpu) L1_DATA_A_START
>> +#define get_l1_data_b_start_cpu(cpu) L1_DATA_B_START
>> +#define get_l1_scratch_start() L1_SCRATCH_START
>> +#define get_l1_code_start() L1_CODE_START
>> +#define get_l1_data_a_start() L1_DATA_A_START
>> +#define get_l1_data_b_start() L1_DATA_B_START
>> +#endif /* !CONFIG_SMP */
>
> grumble. These didn't need to be implemented as macros and hence
> shouldn't have been.
>
> Example:
>
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> get_l1_scratch_start_cpu(cpu);
>
> that code should generate unused variable warnings on CONFIG_SMP=n. If
> it doesn't, you got lucky, because it _should_.
>
> Also
>
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> get_l1_scratch_start_cpu(pcu);
>
> will happily compile and run with CONFIG_SMP=n.
>
>
> macros=bad,bad,bad.
>
Yes, I also prefer inline functions rather than macros here.
Right, Graf?
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
>> +/*
>> + * File: arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> + * Author: Philippe Gerum <rpm@...omai.org>
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2007 Analog Devices Inc.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program; if not, see the file COPYING, or write
>> + * to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
>> + * 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <asm/smp.h>
>> +#include <asm/dma.h>
>> +
>> +#define COREB_SRAM_BASE 0xff600000
>> +#define COREB_SRAM_SIZE 0x4000
>> +
>> +extern char coreb_trampoline_start, coreb_trampoline_end;
>
> OK, these are defined in .S and we do often put declarations for such
> things in .c rather than in .h. But I think it's better to put them in
> .h anyway, to avoid possibly duplicated declarations in the future.
>
Oh, I suggested Graf to run checkpatch.pl to find some issues before I
sent out this patch.
Should this issues be catched by checkpatch.pl?
>> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(boot_lock);
>> +
>> +static cpumask_t cpu_callin_map;
>> +
>>
>> ...
>>
>> +void __cpuinit platform_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + local_irq_disable();
>> +
>> + /* Clone setup for peripheral interrupt sources from CoreA. */
>> + bfin_write_SICB_IMASK0(bfin_read_SICA_IMASK0());
>> + bfin_write_SICB_IMASK1(bfin_read_SICA_IMASK1());
>> + SSYNC();
>> +
>> + /* Clone setup for IARs from CoreA. */
>> + bfin_write_SICB_IAR0(bfin_read_SICA_IAR0());
>> + bfin_write_SICB_IAR1(bfin_read_SICA_IAR1());
>> + bfin_write_SICB_IAR2(bfin_read_SICA_IAR2());
>> + bfin_write_SICB_IAR3(bfin_read_SICA_IAR3());
>> + bfin_write_SICB_IAR4(bfin_read_SICA_IAR4());
>> + bfin_write_SICB_IAR5(bfin_read_SICA_IAR5());
>> + bfin_write_SICB_IAR6(bfin_read_SICA_IAR6());
>> + bfin_write_SICB_IAR7(bfin_read_SICA_IAR7());
>> + SSYNC();
>> +
>> + local_irq_enable();
>> +
>> + /* Calibrate loops per jiffy value. */
>> + calibrate_delay();
>> +
>> + /* Store CPU-private information to the cpu_data array. */
>> + bfin_setup_cpudata(cpu);
>> +
>> + /* We are done with local CPU inits, unblock the boot CPU. */
>> + cpu_set(cpu, cpu_callin_map);
>> + spin_lock(&boot_lock);
>> + spin_unlock(&boot_lock);
>
> Is this spin_lock()+spin_unlock() supposed to block until the secondary
> CPU is running? If so, I don't think it works.
>
We can remove these 2 line spin_lock+spin_unlock and it also works.
But maybe we will add some operation between spin_lock and spin_unlock
here in the future,
we'd like to keep them.
P.S. also forward this patch to linux-arch
Thanks
-Bryan
>> +}
>> +
>>
>> ...
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists