[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4926762A.7000602@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:49:46 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cgroups: enhance task_cgroup()
task_cgroup() calls cgroup_subsys_state().
and we must use rcu_read_lock() to protect cgroup_subsys_state().
so we must use rcu_read_lock() to protect task_cgroup().
but it'll not so friendly to caller: the callers of task_cgroup() have
held cgroup_lock(). it means that struct cgroup will not be freed.
So this patch add rcu_read_lock() in task_cgroup() to enhance task_cgroup().
And we do NOT NEED FIX task_cgroup()'s callers, and cgroup_lock()
can protect task_cgroup().
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
index 1164963..22901ff 100644
--- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
@@ -359,6 +360,10 @@
static inline struct cgroup* task_cgroup(struct task_struct *task,
int subsys_id)
{
- return task_subsys_state(task, subsys_id)->cgroup;
+ struct cgroup *ret;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ ret = task_subsys_state(task, subsys_id)->cgroup;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return ret;
}
int cgroup_clone(struct task_struct *tsk, struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists