[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830811211105p711aebc3v85ffffbc399bdd6e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:05:18 -0800
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: rcu_read_lock() to protect task_cs() even we
don't dereference to task_cs()'s return value
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> task_cs() calls cgroup_subsys_state().
You man "calls task_subsys_state()"
>
> we must use rcu_read_lock() to protect cgroup_subsys_state().
>
> in current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(), we don't dereference to task_cs()'s
> return value, but task_cs() accesses css_set, this css_set maybe freed
> when task_cs() called.
Wouldn't this be fixed by your patch that adds an rcu_read_lock() to
task_subsys_state() ?
Paul
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> index 3e00526..e0e087e 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -1141,7 +1136,11 @@ done:
>
> int current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(void)
> {
> - return task_cs(current) == cpuset_being_rebound;
> + struct cpuset *cs;
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + cs = task_cs(current);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return cs == cpuset_being_rebound;
> }
>
> static int update_relax_domain_level(struct cpuset *cs, s64 val)
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists