[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830811211107n141e6cb5n2abf14e59110d764@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:07:10 -0800
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: rcu_read_lock() to protect task_cs() even we
don't dereference to task_cs()'s return value
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't this be fixed by your patch that adds an rcu_read_lock() to
> task_subsys_state() ?
>
Sorry, your other patch actually adds the rcu_read_lock() to
task_cgroup(). But adding an rcu_read_lock() to task_subsys_state()
would also help here.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists