[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081122093749.GA12543@ioremap.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:37:49 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: John McCutchan <john@...nmccutchan.com>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Robert Love <rlove@...ve.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [take 3] Use pid in inotify events.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 07:39:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann (arnd@...db.de) wrote:
> The how about an inotify_init1 flag telling the kernel to ignore
> changes done by the current PID? That sounds like it is potentially
> useful to other applications that want to monitor the whole file system
> and also write to it. It also doesn't need to change the ABI in
> incompatible ways or introduce a security relevant side channel.
That's a good idea. Robert, John, Michael - comments?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists