lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:42:21 +1030 From: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net> CC: linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [take 3] Use pid in inotify events. On Friday 21 November 2008, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > I have a network server, which gets IO requests from different clients > and maintains coherency of the data between them, but if file is > modified locally I want to flush or invalidate remote data. I decided > not to dig into the kernel on the server node and use inotify to get > notifications about events, but there is no way to determine if given IO > was originated by server itself (and in this case nothing should be > done), or by external application which accesses exported directory (and > in this case I should send update messages to clients). Why not require local access to use the same mechanism as remote, i.e. by "network mounting" the data on the local machine, too. That way there's no confusion over where the change originated nor who's copy must be invalidated. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists