linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroups: enhance task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49276835.4000502@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:02:29 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
CC:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroups: enhance task_cgroup()

Paul Menage wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> task_cgroup() calls cgroup_subsys_state().
> 
> No, it calls task_subsys_state()
> 
>> and we must use rcu_read_lock() to protect cgroup_subsys_state().
>> so we must use rcu_read_lock() to protect task_cgroup().
>>
>> but it'll not so friendly to caller: the callers of task_cgroup() have
>> held cgroup_lock(). it means that struct cgroup will not be freed.
>>
>> So this patch add rcu_read_lock() in task_cgroup() to enhance task_cgroup().
>> And we do NOT NEED FIX task_cgroup()'s callers, and cgroup_lock()
>> can protect task_cgroup().
> 
> Is there a reason to add an implicit rcu_read_lock() in task_cgroup()
> and not directly in task_subsys_state() ?
> 

I don't think it's a good idea to add rcu_read_lock() in task_cgroup() or
task_subsys_state(). The returned pointer of the 2 functions should be
protected by rcu_read_lock or cgroup_lock, so the caller should still
hold the lock by itself.

An example of this is:

static int mem_cgroup_charge_common(...)
{
	...
		rcu_read_lock();
		mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
		if (unlikely(!mem)) {
			rcu_read_unlock();
			return 0;
		}
		/*
		 * For every charge from the cgroup, increment reference count
		 */
		css_get(&mem->css);
		rcu_read_unlock();
	...
}

> Paul
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
>> index 1164963..22901ff 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
>> @@ -359,6 +360,10 @@
>>  static inline struct cgroup* task_cgroup(struct task_struct *task,
>>                                               int subsys_id)
>>  {
>> -       return task_subsys_state(task, subsys_id)->cgroup;
>> +       struct cgroup *ret;
>> +       rcu_read_lock();
>> +       ret = task_subsys_state(task, subsys_id)->cgroup;
>> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>> +       return ret;
>>  }
>>
>>  int cgroup_clone(struct task_struct *tsk, struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
>>
>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/