[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081124215247.GA29696@1wt.eu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:52:47 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com>
Cc: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:219 dev_watchdog+0xfe/0x17e() with tg3 network
Hi Matt,
just a follow-up.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:27:44PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:53:18PM -0800, Matt Carlson wrote:
> > > Today, with the notebook connected to a gig switch, I could not reproduce
> > > the problem, even after one hour of approximately the same workload. I'll
> > > retry with the original 100 Mbps switch on monday.
>
> fairly easier now with the same switch. I just have to transfer 100k objects
> over HTTP via this switch to see the problem happen :
>
> tg3: eth0: The system may be re-ordering memory-mapped I/O cycles to the network device, attempting to recover. Please report the problem to the driver maintainer and include system chipset information.
> tg3: tg3_stop_block timed out, ofs=1400 enable_bit=2
> tg3: tg3_stop_block timed out, ofs=c00 enable_bit=2
> tg3: eth0: Link is down.
> tg3: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex.
> tg3: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX.
>
> The switch is an el-cheapo D-Link 10/100. Note that this time I did not see
> any warning. Maybe I did not wait long enough though.
Got it again, just had to be patient to fire a second test :
WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:219 dev_watchdog+0x1a4/0x1b0()
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (tg3): transmit timed out
Modules linked in: nfs lockd sunrpc mtdblock mtd_blkdevs slram mtd xt_tcpudp x_tables usbhid usb_storage ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc tg3 libphy ide_cs yenta_socket rsrc_nonstatic [last unloaded: ip_tables]
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-wt2-wtap #1
[<b01254a7>] warn_slowpath+0x67/0x90
[<b01741a9>] ? get_slab+0x9/0x70
[<b03d21af>] ? pskb_copy+0x2f/0x160
[<b03aa332>] ? input_defuzz_abs_event+0x12/0xa0
[<b03aa574>] ? input_handle_event+0x14/0x2a0
[<b03b3d76>] ? synaptics_process_packet+0x2b6/0x3d0
[<b0108a48>] ? native_io_delay+0x8/0x40
[<b02ab4c9>] ? strlen+0x9/0x20
[<b02a961e>] ? strlcpy+0x1e/0x60
[<b03dbfbc>] ? netdev_drivername+0x3c/0x40
[<b03e7c84>] dev_watchdog+0x1a4/0x1b0
[<b013a27e>] ? run_hrtimer_pending+0xe/0xb0
[<b03e7ae0>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x1b0
[<b012d548>] ? timer_stats_account_timer+0x38/0x40
[<b03e7ae0>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x1b0
[<b012dbbc>] run_timer_softirq+0xac/0x170
[<b013f863>] ? tick_periodic+0x33/0x70
[<b013f8b7>] ? tick_handle_periodic+0x17/0x70
[<b03e7ae0>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x1b0
[<b0129ae4>] __do_softirq+0x84/0xa0
[<b0129b35>] do_softirq+0x35/0x40
[<b0129bf6>] irq_exit+0x66/0x70
[<b0105869>] do_IRQ+0x49/0x90
[<b013bc30>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xb0/0x100
[<b010449b>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28
[<b0305158>] ? acpi_safe_halt+0x1b/0x29
[<b0305b07>] acpi_idle_enter_c1+0xa6/0x117
[<b03c096b>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x6b/0xa0
[<b010206f>] cpu_idle+0x4f/0x70
[<b04458dd>] rest_init+0x4d/0x50
=======================
---[ end trace 1cc3b74458d87dab ]---
tg3: eth0: transmit timed out, resetting
tg3: DEBUG: MAC_TX_STATUS[0000000b] MAC_RX_STATUS[00000006]
tg3: DEBUG: RDMAC_STATUS[00000000] WDMAC_STATUS[00000008]
tg3: tg3_stop_block timed out, ofs=1400 enable_bit=2
tg3: tg3_stop_block timed out, ofs=c00 enable_bit=2
tg3: tg3_stop_block timed out, ofs=4c00 enable_bit=2
tg3: eth0: Link is down.
tg3: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex.
tg3: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX.
The ease with which I reproduce it here clearly indicates that this is
related to the switch, probably just the fact that it is at 100 Mbps.
Unfortunately this evening I must go, but I still have one 100 Mbps
switch somewhere at home, I'll reproduce the same test ASAP in order
to bisect the issue.
Regards,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists