[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1L4jMt-0006OW-5J@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:53:19 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
CC: cl@...ux-foundation.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
david@...morbit.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] slab: __GFP_NOWARN not being propagated from mempool_alloc()
We see page allocation failure warnings on the mempool_alloc() path.
See this lkml posting for example:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/27/100
The cause is that on NUMA, alloc_slabmgmt() clears __GFP_NOWARN,
together with __GFP_THISNODE and __GFP_NORETRY. But AFAICS it really
only wants to clear __GFP_THISNODE.
Does this patch looks good?
Warning: it's completely untested.
Miklos
---
mm/slab.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slab.c 2008-10-24 12:40:34.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/mm/slab.c 2008-11-24 22:17:04.000000000 +0100
@@ -2609,7 +2609,8 @@ static struct slab *alloc_slabmgmt(struc
if (OFF_SLAB(cachep)) {
/* Slab management obj is off-slab. */
slabp = kmem_cache_alloc_node(cachep->slabp_cache,
- local_flags & ~GFP_THISNODE, nodeid);
+ local_flags & ~__GFP_THISNODE,
+ nodeid);
if (!slabp)
return NULL;
} else {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists