[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081125072156.GA3771@gollum.tnic>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:21:56 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: bzolnier@...il.com, sshtylyov@...mvista.com,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is the change to IDE probing really necessary?
[.. ]
> > And the probing _is_ done when loaded as a module so the problem is
> > not with the mask - in your case the probing will work just fine as
> > you need ide0 and ide1, AFAICT.
>
> Out of curiousity, I loaded ide-generic as a module and tried the suggested
> probe_mask. It loads after e100 which is built in and then has a crap attack
> as it tries to register IO regions which are already registered, triggers
> sysfs warnings for creating duplicate files and then continues along to
> a state where networking doesn't work anyway. That suggestion of 0x3f may
> still catch someone.
Yep, the message could be misleading wrt to the probe_mask. Is something
along the lines of
"please adjust the probe_mask module parameter for probing the rest of the
legacy ISA IDE ports"
more informative? Now it implies that the primary/secondary ports are
probed by default.
However, you still have to set it to something > 0x3 if you want to
probe ide[2-5]. Also, there's still the option of CONFIG_BLK_DEV_GENERIC
which adds support for otherwise unsupported IDE PCI controllers.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists