[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45a44e480811260118v440716bbqa8d37c8b696c148a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:18:27 -0500
From: "Jaya Kumar" <jayakumar.lkml@...il.com>
To: "Paulius Zaleckas" <paulius.zaleckas@...tonika.lt>
Cc: "David Brownell" <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
"David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org>,
"Eric Miao" <eric.miao@...vell.com>,
"Haavard Skinnemoen" <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
"Philipp Zabel" <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
"Russell King" <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
"Ben Gardner" <bgardner@...tec.com>, "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2.6.27 1/1] gpiolib: add support for batch set of pins
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Paulius Zaleckas
<paulius.zaleckas@...tonika.lt> wrote:
> Jaya Kumar wrote:
>> * @to_irq: optional hook supporting non-static gpio_to_irq() mappings;
>> * implementation may not sleep
>> * @dbg_show: optional routine to show contents in debugfs; default code
>> @@ -84,6 +86,9 @@ struct gpio_chip {
>> unsigned offset, int value);
>> void (*set)(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>> unsigned offset, int value);
>> + void (*set_bus)(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>> + unsigned offset, int values,
>
> I think values should be unsigned
>
Okay, can do but it is unusual no? since set uses int value, i figured
set_bus should be similar right?
Thanks,
jaya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists