[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <492E72D7.9060201@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:13:43 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>, lguest@...abs.org,
jeremy@...source.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Lguest] [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> I suspect we could get it down to three bytes, by sharing the last
>> byte of the four-byte call sequence with the first byte of the next:
>>
>> 66 e8 ff 66 e8 fc 66 e8 f9 66 e8 f6 ...
>>
>> Every three bytes a new stub begins; it's a four-byte call to offset
>> 0x6703 relative to the beginning of the first stub.
>>
>> Can anyone better 24 bits/stub?
>
> On the entirely silly level...
>
> CC xx
Nice. Can actually go to zero, by pointing the IDT at (unmapped_area +
vector), and deducing the vector in the page fault handler from cr2.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists