[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081127105635.GG6703@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:56:35 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
lguest@...abs.org, jeremy@...source.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Lguest] [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:13:43PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> >>I suspect we could get it down to three bytes, by sharing the last
> >>byte of the four-byte call sequence with the first byte of the next:
> >>
> >> 66 e8 ff 66 e8 fc 66 e8 f9 66 e8 f6 ...
> >>
> >>Every three bytes a new stub begins; it's a four-byte call to offset
> >>0x6703 relative to the beginning of the first stub.
> >>
> >>Can anyone better 24 bits/stub?
> >
> >On the entirely silly level...
> >
> >CC xx
>
> Nice. Can actually go to zero, by pointing the IDT at (unmapped_area +
> vector), and deducing the vector in the page fault handler from cr2.
That would be still one byte, otherwise you wouldn't get a unique index.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists