| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <b637ec0b0811270717t360ce5f9j3d48e8a007010b0e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:17:13 +0100 From: "Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@...il.com> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: "Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Jay Fenlason" <fenlason@...hat.com> Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable - hibernate related Hi On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: > On Wednesday, 26 of November 2008, Stefan Richter wrote: >> >> The 2.6.27.5 changelog shows a bunch of ACPI changes. They may not be >> responsible, but in my uninformed opinion these are the changes to look >> at more closely. Since plain bisection did not work well for you, maybe >> you should ask the maintainers involved in the ACPI patches for a >> priority list of patches to unapply for long-term tests. > > Actually, yes, Fabio, you can try to revert all of the "ACPI: EC:" commits > applied after 2.6.27.4 and retest. Will do tonight. I see that there are some other "ACPI: EC:" commits in 2.6.27.6 and 2.6.27.7. I'l just compile the ec.c file from 2.6.27.4 in 2.6.27.7 and test if the three commits introduced in 2.6.27.5 wouldn't revert cleanly, By the way, my HD passed a "smartctl -t long" test without any problems. > > Thanks, > Rafael > Regards, Fabio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists