linux-kernel - Re: Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b637ec0b0811271354l58fc6039m941ca37fb9173d5b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:54:14 +0100
From:	"Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	"Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Jay Fenlason" <fenlason@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable - hibernate related

Hi

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>> Actually, yes, Fabio, you can try to revert all of the "ACPI: EC:" commits
>> applied after 2.6.27.4 and retest.
>
> Will do tonight. I see that there are some other "ACPI: EC:" commits
> in 2.6.27.6 and 2.6.27.7.
>
> I'l just compile the ec.c file from 2.6.27.4 in 2.6.27.7 and test if
> the three commits introduced in 2.6.27.5 wouldn't revert cleanly,
>
> By the way, my HD passed a "smartctl -t long" test without any problems.
>

Reproduced with 2.6.27.7 with ec.c taken from 2.6.27.4 - after three
minutes of freeze the laptop came back to normal as nothing had
happened.

>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rafael
>>

Regards,
Fabio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/