| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200812050124.29958.rjw@sisk.pl> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:24:29 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> To: "Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@...il.com> Cc: "Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Jay Fenlason" <fenlason@...hat.com>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, rui.zhang@...el.com Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable - hibernate related (CCing to linux-acpi at Rui's request) On Thursday, 27 of November 2008, Fabio Comolli wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@...il.com> wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: > >> Actually, yes, Fabio, you can try to revert all of the "ACPI: EC:" commits > >> applied after 2.6.27.4 and retest. > > > > Will do tonight. I see that there are some other "ACPI: EC:" commits > > in 2.6.27.6 and 2.6.27.7. > > > > I'l just compile the ec.c file from 2.6.27.4 in 2.6.27.7 and test if > > the three commits introduced in 2.6.27.5 wouldn't revert cleanly, > > > > By the way, my HD passed a "smartctl -t long" test without any problems. > > > > Reproduced with 2.6.27.7 with ec.c taken from 2.6.27.4 - after three > minutes of freeze the laptop came back to normal as nothing had > happened. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists