linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] ring-buffer fix for 2.6.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <492E0FD2.8040805@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:11:14 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ring-buffer fix for 2.6.28

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> The following patch needs to go into 2.6.28. It protects against
> a recursion race that can happen when the scheduler is traced.
> 
> The following patches are in:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> 
>     branch: devel
> 
> 
> Lai Jiangshan (1):
>       ring-buffer: prevent recursion
> 
> ----
>  kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Is there something about git that causes (or forces) the use of
patch 0/1 followed by patch 1/1?  I find it terribly unwanted.

thanks,
-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/