[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081127035913.GA4168@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:59:13 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
riel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg reclaim shouldn't change zone->recent_rotated statics.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:49:46PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:54:22 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:22:53 +0900 (JST)
> > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > > + if (scan_global_lru(sc))
> >
> > mutter. scan_global_lru() is a terrible function name. Anyone reading
> > that code would expect that this function, umm, scans the global LRU.
> >
> > gcc has a nice convention wherein such functions have a name ending in
> > "_p" (for "predicate"). Don't do this :)
> >
>
> Hmm, I'll prepare renaming patch.
>
> scan_global_lru_p() ?
That only works well when you don't have to use underscores, "listp"
or in Lisps where words can be hyphenated "loaded-module-p".
But scan_global_lru_p() looks terrible.
> or under_scanning_global_lru() ?
How about just scanning_global_lru()?
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists