[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200812020629.26714.elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 06:29:24 +0100
From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, greg@...ah.com, mingo@...e.hu,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, lenb@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru
Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.26: Hibernation (possibly suspend) broken on Toshiba R500 (bisected)
On Tuesday 02 December 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> That said, if you can show the differences in dmesg from the two cases,
> it would probably be interesting to see why it happens that way. Why
> did we bother setting up that PCI bus window in -rc3 at all? Was it
> there from the beginning?
Attached is a full diff between dmesg from -rc3 and -rc6 with your debug
patch.
I've cleaned up the diff a bit to make it more readable (mostly removal of
changes that I always get due to random USB load order changes - UHCI
still frequently loads before EHCI).
The most interesting points are probably at lines 298-346 and 639-649.
At the bottom there's a fairly long addition from the few suspend/resume
cycles I did (again, running with the debug patch).
View attachment "rc3-rc6.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (94938 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists