linux-kernel - Re: Regression from 2.6.26: Hibernation (possibly suspend) broken on Toshiba R500 (bisected)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812012037320.3256@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:46:20 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
cc:	rjw@...k.pl, greg@...ah.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, lenb@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.de,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru
Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.26: Hibernation (possibly suspend) broken
 on Toshiba R500 (bisected)



On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> 
> You're in luck. I still had /proc/io* contents from .28-rc3 lying around 
> from working on some other issue.
> 
> Here's the relevant diff for iomem; there's no diff for ioports.
> 
> --- iomem_2.6.28-rc3    2008-11-03 10:59:37.000000000 +0100
> +++ iomem_2.6.28-rc6_linus      2008-12-02 05:20:31.000000000 +0100
> @@ -10,10 +10,9 @@
>  7e7b0000-7e7c53ff : reserved
>  7e7c5400-7e7e7fb7 : ACPI Non-volatile Storage
>  7e7e7fb8-7effffff : reserved
> -80000000-83ffffff : PCI Bus 0000:02
> -  80000000-83ffffff : PCI CardBus 0000:03
> -84000000-87ffffff : PCI CardBus 0000:03
> -88000000-88000fff : Intel Flush Page
> +80000000-83ffffff : PCI CardBus 0000:03
> +84000000-84000fff : Intel Flush Page
> +84400000-847fffff : PCI CardBus 0000:03
>  d0000000-dfffffff : 0000:00:02.0
>    d0000000-d076ffff : vesafb
>  e0000000-e00fffff : PCI Bus 0000:10

I'm not seeing how this could matter. In the latter one, we apparently 
don't set up any PCI bus memory window, but I bet it's a transparent 
bridge, and it shouldn't matter. IOW, your dmesg probably has a line like 
this somewhere:

	pci 0000:00:1e.0: transparent bridge

and whether there is an explicit bus window or not is simply immaterial.

That said, if you can show the differences in dmesg from the two cases, it 
would probably be interesting to see why it happens that way.  Why did we 
bother setting up that PCI bus window in -rc3 at all? Was it there from 
the beginning?

> I've tried a few quick suspend/resume cycles and no failures so far, but 
> that's not really conclusive yet.
> 
> Besides snd_hda_intel I've also been unloading e1000e before suspend 
> because I thought it contributed to resume failures. I'm now keeping that 
> loaded as well. Will report results.

There were some HDA fixes recently, although I don't think they should 
matter for suspend/resume (well, at least a couple of them should fix the 
case of sound being _silent_ on resume, but shouldn't have caused any 
other issues).

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/