[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081203001811.GF6703@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 01:18:12 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
manfred@...orfullife.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schamp@....com, niv@...ibm.com,
dvhltc@...ibm.com, ego@...ibm.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] v9 scalable classic RCU implementation
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 03:51:45PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:31:44AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > o I now test with a more brutal random-selection online/offline
> > > script (attached). Probably more brutal than it needs to be
> > > on the people reading it as well, but so it goes.
> >
> > Does that cover both dynticks on and off? afaik the dynticks off problem
> > I ran into on a 16 thread box and we discussed some time ago is still there.
>
> The failures I see with this patch I also see with mainline. Are you
> seeing something with this patch that does not happen with mainline?
No, that is in mainline too. Sorry to be misleading. Do you see the
same problems in your testing?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists